Friday, October 22, 2010

Film Salieri Straming

PRESS

Following the publication of the article of 12/10, we find that G. Dufay perseveres in error.
We note the comments of the president of aberrant TransEurope TGV RR is testament to his ignorance of the file. Indeed, Ms. Dufay remains the only (with perhaps Mr. Raquin) was trying to "lead to the southern branch of the TGV in conditions compatible with high speed" even qu'RFF for at least 3 years (pre -report Preliminary étues of 2007), indicated that the southern branch is technically incompatible with high speed.
Creating conditions for high-speed line would dedicate only to travelers (see also: http://www.lepays.fr/fr/article/3464677/Il-faut-revoir-la-copie-de- the-branch-sud.html) while the specifications of the State (2003) calls for a line RFF mixed freight / passenger (not passenger / freight). Ms. Dufay, contradicts the very foundations of the project, she would claim (and especially the means) to request an amendment to the state's specifications? In this case, Ms. Dufay she can fund new studies and new preliminary phases of consultation (good years of blather into perspective)? No matter, the tens of millions needed for these studies will add to the billion missing for the completion of the branch, whose " financing commission is not yet constituted . And we do not even speak to finance the South Fork.

For Ms. Dufay, the Montbeliard are probably not the only cash cows of Franche-Comte, there are also Francs-Comtois!

For details, borders the mail sent a few weeks ago Ms. Dufay by Christian Guillot, president of Active en Bresse.

0 comments:

Post a Comment